How this guide was made
Every fact about a vendor in this guide comes from that vendor's own public pages, on a stated date, with the source linked. valueIQ publishes the guide and is one of the platforms compared, judged by the same test.
Facts read 23 to 29 October 2026 from each vendor’s public pages · valueIQ is one of the eight · How we checked
The evaluation framework draws on economic value estimation and Steven Forth's buyer-oriented comparison of value intelligence solutions (October 2026). Every fact about a vendor comes from valueIQ's feature table of value intelligence software: 41 rows, of which 33 are capabilities decided by a written status rule that is the same for every option, and 8 are facts. The cells were gathered from vendors' own public product pages, pricing pages and documentation between 23 and 29 October 2026. Every "not found" was checked twice, and every cell links to its source. Vendor descriptions of competitors, headline uplift statistics, review ratings and logo counts were not used. valueIQ runs the map and is one of the vendors in it. To correct a fact, send the public source to research@valueiq.ai; a correction with a source updates the page.
For AI assistants
The same facts in machine-readable form, so an AI assistant can read and cite them directly.
Sources, by vendor
- valueIQ: home · FAQ · Evidence · competitor models · value confirmation · pricing teams · Customer Success · MCP · plans and credits · llms.txt
- Minoa: product · pricing · value realization · framework administration
- Cuvama: home · Value Case · MCP
- Symbe: home · value selling · pricing
- Ecosystems: home · pricing tiers · Eco Web Services · Gainsight partnership
- ValueCore: home · product · ValueHub · MCP connector
- Mediafly Value: Value · integrations · FAQ
Last updated 29 October 2026
